/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) person pronouns (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: person pronouns
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : ^[57]Luzón, 2017), which recalls ^[58]Biber and Gray’s (2016) claim that there is an increasing ‘colloquialisation’ of written texts in digital media. Research also contends that the functional goals associated with the linguistic features of these texts are to construct a credible online identity, assert the researchers’ professionalism and create proximity with readers. Studies on spoken genres such as TED Talks also report the use of conversational features such as deictics, person pronouns (I/you) and inclusive we-pronouns to communicate expert knowledge while conveying “a certain degree of informality and colloquialism” (^[59]Caliendo, 2012: 101 ). It is also argued that TED Talk presenters use stance markers to express judgments and position themselves subjectively (^[60]Scotto di Carlo, 2014).
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : The present study also sheds light on the situational (register) and contextual (genre) constraints that shape digital texts. In TED Talks, presenters use a conversational style to tell issues of science and the use of linguistic resources such as first and second person pronouns reduces distance “to breach the expert/non expert barrier” (^[178]Scotto di Carlo, 2014: 201 ). In research blogs, conversational features construct proximity (^[179]Luzón, 2013), and in online medical campaigns language resources help scientists to construct credible identities (^[180]Paulus & Roberts, 2018). In analysing science popularisation genres, ^[181]Motta Roth and Scotti Scherer (2016: 173) also underline the “interdiscursivity between discourses from scientific, pedagogic and media spheres”. In the crowdfunding proposals analysed in this study, the situational and contextual constraints easily explain why these texts rely on both grammatical features that are typical of conversation and features
Evaluando al candidato person pronouns:
2) conversational: 3
3) construct: 3 (*)
4) texts: 3 (*)
person pronouns
Lengua: eng
Frec: 20
Docs: 6
Nombre propio: / 20 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.801 = (2 + (1+3.32192809488736) / (1+4.39231742277876)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| person pronouns |
: Martínez, I. (2005). Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing 14(3), 174-190. |